Switching course materials is an opportunity to rethink the design of a course. One planning technique that's helped me become more focused and effective as an educator is Backward Design (link to Wikipedia), applied to curriculum development by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe. As Ryan Bowen from the Vanderbilt University Center of Teaching explains, "If done thoroughly, [backward design] eliminates the possibility of doing certain activities and tasks for the sake of doing them. Every task and piece of instruction has a purpose that fits in with the overarching goals and goals of the course." In other words, before finding an open substitute for your textbook, it helps to first reflect on how to help your learners reach their course goals.
Backward design begins with what you want your students to know or be able to do by the end of the course (your learning goals, objectives, or outcomes). Why start here? Consider a metaphor used by Mary Burgess, Executive Director of BC Campus. She says learning design work is more like air travel: I want to buy a ticket to Portland and end up in Portland. I don’t want to buy a ticket to Portland and end up in Toronto. And I don’t want to buy a blank ticket that comes with a vague promise that it’s about the journey.
Learning objectives should be specific and measurable so that you can assess whether students have met them (we'll talk more about this in the next section). You may have around 5 overall objectives that express what your students will know or be able to do by the end of the quarter. There may be institutional or professional objectives that you don’t get to choose or modify (though it may help to rewrite them in language that makes more sense to you, or that express them in terms that are measurable). Learning objectives often use the phrase “In order to.” Examples:
Recognize different business information needs in order to choose appropriate research tools.
Synthesize data and information from a variety of sources in order to draw your own conclusions in real-world business situations.
Many people find Bloom's Taxonomy to be a useful tool for providing verbs to write learning objectives precisely. The knowledge and skills at the bottom of the taxonomy (list, find, identify, memorize) are less complex than the ones at the top (design, device, critique, test, compare). Learners may build on the lower-order skills in order to achieve higher-order skills. The University of Arkansas's Teaching Innovation and Pedagogical Support unit provides more advice about "Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Write Effective Learning Objectives."
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, Jay. (1998). Understanding by design [get it from the library]. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.